![Pearson correlation - can negative values in your data artificially increase the size of the correlation? - Cross Validated Pearson correlation - can negative values in your data artificially increase the size of the correlation? - Cross Validated](https://i.stack.imgur.com/6EtYx.png)
Pearson correlation - can negative values in your data artificially increase the size of the correlation? - Cross Validated
![How do you Format "Red" for negative numbers in a column only for a measure ($ % Chg.YA ) without affecting the rows : r/tableau How do you Format "Red" for negative numbers in a column only for a measure ($ % Chg.YA ) without affecting the rows : r/tableau](https://preview.redd.it/nv0rwd2ea4n51.png?width=792&format=png&auto=webp&s=9afd1808dcc56dec25ebb3fc23207fefae35dcff)
How do you Format "Red" for negative numbers in a column only for a measure ($ % Chg.YA ) without affecting the rows : r/tableau
![Confused as to why a negative base without parentheses for an exponent would equal a positive number according to ETS. I thought that if there are no parentheses, the power applies only Confused as to why a negative base without parentheses for an exponent would equal a positive number according to ETS. I thought that if there are no parentheses, the power applies only](https://preview.redd.it/26p8eldabuu41.jpg?width=1066&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=be5c53d83e8fa5f18fa7a16b26977900abad2e83)